|
|
 |
 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Genetic-modification-myths |
| |
There are many
stories that surround
biotechnology – but how many
of these are true ... and if
they aren’t, what’s the real
story?
|
| |
|
| |
GM food means that we'd
be eating genes and it's not
natural to eat another
organism's genes.
|
| |
It’s impossible to eat
without eating genes.
Every organism contains
genes. When we eat an apple,
we eat the genes in the DNA
contained within its cells.
These genes in the apple are
‘foreign’ genes, but they
don’t have any effect on us
because they're digested.
The same goes for eating
meat.
Even after food is
cooked, we're still
consuming genes. The cooking
process partially breaks the
molecules of DNA; we then
eat the fragments of DNA in
the cooked food. During
digestion, the DNA is broken
down to its smallest
building blocks. Processed
plant or animal products,
such as wheat flour or
salami, still contain gene
fragments from the
original ingredients, which
are also broken down during
digestion.
It is quite natural to
eat another organism’s genes
– actually, it's impossible
to avoid - but it doesn't
mean that we absorb their
genes into our sustem and
acquire their
characteristics. The genes
in GM foods are made of the
same material as the genes
that we eat every day in all
fruits, vegetables and meat,
and are treated by the body
in the same way as other
genes. If you eat DNA in a
GM food, or a conventional
food, it won't change your
DNA, or the DNA of your
children. |
| |
|
| |
Myth: Gene technology is
inherently risky so we
shouldn’t proceed with it.
|
| |
Many people are worried that
gene technology is very
risky, and it's certainly
sensible to consider any
hazards that this new
technology may bring. By
recognising its potential
risks, we can ensure that
appropriate safety measures
are in place. In this way,
gene technology is like many
other technologies we
currently use; for
example, electricity. Electricity
is delivered to our homes,
schools and offices in a
form that is easily
lethal — and yet we accept
the risk because great care
is taken to minimise its
dangers and because we
appreciate the benefits that
this technology has brought
us. In Australia, gene
technology is carefully
regulated so that any risks
are managed and contained,
while allowing its benefits
to be realised.
The Office of the Gene
Technology Regulator was
established by the
Commonwealth Gene Technology
Act 2001 (GT Act), and is
responsible for regulating
genetically modified
organisms (GMOs). The object
of the GT Act is to “protect
the health and safety of
people, and protect the
environment, by identifying
risks posed by or as a
result of gene technology,
and by managing those risks
through regulating certain
dealings with GMOs”. ‘Dealings’
with GMOs include contained
laboratory research, field
trials and commercial
release of GM crops.
The GT Act establishes
offences for unauthorised
dealings with genetically
modified organisms. If such
dealings occur, offenders
are subject to penalties of
up $1.1 million, or 5 years
imprisonment. These
penalties are described in
more detail in Part 4,
Division 2 of the Gene
Technology Act.
For more
information about the OGTR
and the GT Act contact the
OGTR on 1800 181 030, or
visit their website.
The Food Standards
Australia New Zealand (FSANZ)
protects public health by
ensuring that GM foods are
safe for consumption. FSANZ
assesses the safety of GM
foods, and all GM foods must
be assessed as safe before
they are allowed to be sold
in Australia.
The Australia New Zealand
Food Standards Code provides
a common set of food
regulations in Australia and
New Zealand, including
standards for GM foods.
Food standards have the
force of law. It's a
criminal offence in
Australia to supply food
that doesn't comply with
relevant food standards. For
more information about FSANZ
and food standards, contact
FSANZ on +61 2 6271 2222 or
visit their website |
| |
|
| |
Myth: Natural is always
best, and altering,
exchanging or transferring
genes isn’t natural, so it
can’t be good for us.
|
| |
Nature supports us, but not
everything in the natural
world is always good for us.
Cancer-causing ultraviolet
radiation from the sun is
natural; tobacco and opium
are natural. Plenty of
poisonous plants and animals
are natural. It's also
important to remember
that the way we live today
isn't ‘natural’. Humans have
significantly altered nature
to provide a more
comfortable and stable
lifestyle.
In the same way,
modifying plants and animals
isn't strictly natural, and
yet humans have done this
from earliest times.
Selective breeding has been
used to produce different
types of dog, different
types of domesticated farm
animals, and all of our crop
species. Selective breeding
is a process used to produce
new or improved strains of
plants and animals by
selecting and breeding for
valuable characteristics,
such as wheat with higher
protein grain.
Selective breeding using
crossing can give rise to
quite unexpected outcomes.
This is because crossing
mixes thousands of genes in
unpredictable ways. The
creation of new varieties by
selective crossing involves
extensive testing to ensure
that natural toxins haven't
developed.

Gene technology helps us
to breed new varieties of
agricultural species more
easily and more quickly than
in the past, as a
specific gene or genes can
be selected and transferred;
whereas conventional
breeding involves a random
crossing of a number of
genes, which may or may not
include the gene of
interest. In addition,
because only a few required
genes are transferred using
gene technology, time
consuming ‘back-crossing’
steps used in conventional
breeding programs can be
omitted.
As described above, new
varieties created by gene
technology are extensively
tested before being released
commercially, either for use
in agriculture and industry,
or for consumption as food. |
| |
|
| |
Myth: Cloning never
happens in nature.
|
| |
Cloning happens quite often
in nature, particularly in
the plant world. Whenever a
plant sends out a runner,
which then develops into a
new plant, the original
plant has produced a clone.
If a cactus drops a fragment
that then puts down roots,
cloning has happened again.
Animal and human cloning
also happens naturally to
produce identical twins (or
triplets). Modern gene
technology is sometimes
involved in creating clones
of animals at the early
embryo stage. This is
similar to the process that
creates identical twins.
Animals can also be
cloned past the embryo stage
to produce a new animal; for
example, Dolly the sheep was
cloned using DNA from
another sheep. This is a
useful way to ensure that an
unusually productive or
desirable farm animal can be
reproduced. If the high
quality animal was instead
bred with another
individual, it could produce
offspring without the
desired qualities due to the
random mixing of genes that
happens in the conventional
breeding process. |
| |
|
| |
Myth: Changing a gene
would never happen
naturally, so we shouldn’t
do it.
|
| |
Genes often change, and this
is one of the ways diversity
has been created in nature.
Changes can happen naturally
by mutation, where the DNA
is altered by radiation from
the sun and space, by
chemicals, or sometimes even
by viruses. Genetic change
can also happen when eggs
and sperm are formed, during
which chromosomes break and
re-join, sometimes
fragmenting genes and
reconstituting them with
slightly different versions.
These continual natural
changes in genes — and the
shuffling around of
different versions of genes
by sexual
reproduction — cause the
variation that we see in
living things, and help to
make every individual
different. Over time, gene
changes have also been
responsible for evolution. |
| |
|
| |
Myth: Gene technology
will allow people to create
stronger, healthier,
brighter and nicer-looking
children.
|
| |
It’s an interesting idea,
but at the moment it’s not
possible for gene technology
to be used in this
way. Characteristics such as
beauty, intelligence and
strength are very complex
and it’s likely that many
genes, as well as
environmental effects,
contribute to each.
Scientists don’t yet know
enough about human genetics
to use gene technology to
change these
characteristics. Of course,
the future may be different.
Whether science is used in
such a way must depend on
how it's directed, which is
why the community and our
elected representatives need
to be well informed and
educated about the latest
scientific developments. |
| |
|
| |
Myth: A plant gene is
fundamentally different from
an animal gene, and they’re
both unlike human genes, so
we shouldn’t put genes from
an animal into a plant or
vice versa
|
| |
All genes, whether they come
from a plant or animal or
human, are made of the same
chemical substance — DNA.
DNA contains four variable
portions, known as bases.
The order in which these
bases are arranged is what
makes genes different. But
the bases themselves, and
the DNA of which they are a
part, are the same whether
they come from a gum tree, a
mouse, a mushroom, a
butterfly or a person.
Language provides a good
analogy for this. If you
re-arrange the words in an
English sentence you can
change the meaning. But the
sentence is still written
using English words; each
sentence is ‘composed’ of
the same stuff arranged
differently — exactly as
with genes. Biologists now
know that every living thing
on Earth uses the same
genetic language — just as
every book written in
English uses the same
English words. A ‘foreign’
language for life could
exist elsewhere in the
universe, but on Earth
there's only one.
Because animals and
plants evolved from a common
ancestor, many of their gene
activities are very similar.
In both cases, the genes
that code for making vital
molecules for cells to
function — for example,
enzymes for extracting
energy or for copying
DNA — are virtually
identical in any cell, from
any organism, anywhere.
In fact, substances that
we think of as being very
much animal products can be
found in plants. An example
is haemoglobin, the
oxygen-carrying pigment that
makes our blood red. The
roots of various plants also
have a form of haemoglobin.
The tiny energy factories in
cells – called mitochondria
– are nearly identical in
plants and animals. The
genes that code for the
construction and the
functioning of mitochondria
are virtually
indistinguishable between
different groups of
organisms.
The chemical similarity
of plants to ourselves is
the reason that we're able
to use them as food.
Whenever we eat plants, we
eat their genes. If you eat
a meal of meat and
vegetables, you're eating
genes from plants and from
animals together.
The order of bases in
human DNA is remarkably
similar to that of many
other organisms. The closer
a creature is to us in terms
of evolution, the greater
this similarity. For
example, about 98 per
cent of our gene sequences
are the same as those in
chimpanzees. We also share a
proportion (albeit smaller)
of our gene sequences in
common with plants. For this
reason, adding a gene found
in a plant to an animal, or
vice-versa, is seen by some
researchers as not breaking
much of a barrier.
Gene transfers can
sometimes occur in
nature — although not to the
same degree that
biotechnology makes
possible. For example,
bacteria that colonise plant
roots can sometimes pass
genes into plants. Viruses
regularly move their genes
into the cells of the
organism that they are
infecting. New virus
particles can naturally
contain fragments of the
‘host’ genes as well as
their own, and may pass
these on when infecting
another host.
Milk, cheese and eggs
contain plenty of genes from
animals. For lacto-ovo-vegetarians,
the possibility of an
‘animal gene’ in a plant may
not be a concern. However,
vegans may find it ethically
wrong to eat a plant that
contains a gene that is
usually found only in
animals. Similar ethical
objections hold true for
those who adhere strictly to
religious dietary rules
banning the consumption of
certain animals (eg. pig or
cow). Consumers concerned
about this can contact food
manufacturers for detailed
information about their
products, including any GM
foodstuffs. |
| |
|
|