|
Despite successes in cloning
mice and a small number of
other currently living
species, the possibility of
successfully cloning an
individual from the frozen
remains of a woolly mammoth
recently discovered in the
Siberian permafrost or a
100-year-old
alcohol-preserved thylacine
(Tasmanian tiger) seems
remote.

For both these specimens,
the first stage of the
process — extracting DNA
samples from the preserved
tissue — has been achieved.
From there the going gets
tougher, even though the
starting materials are far
better than those available
for the dinosaur cloning
seen in the movie
Jurassic Park.
In 1999, DNA was
successfully extracted from
an ethanol‑preserved
Tasmanian tiger pup sample.
In 2001, additional DNA was
extracted from two other
pups using tissue from bone,
tooth, bone marrow and dried
muscle.
In 2002, the Evolutionary
Biology Unit at the
Australian Museum in Sydney
successfully replicated
individual Tasmanian tiger
genes using a process known
as PCR. The next stage would
have been to make copies of
all the genes of the
Tasmanian tiger to construct
synthetic chromosomes.
However, in 2005, the
project was abandoned,
because the DNA was found to
be too degraded to work with
effectively.
Producing viable embryos
would be too difficult —
perhaps even impossible —
using the DNA preserved
through freezing or in
alcohol, as it is often
damaged. Given the low
efficiency of mouse cloning
experiments, in which intact
nuclei from living cells
were used as the source of
DNA for cloning, the
likelihood of being able to
clone an animal from a
preserved specimen is
extremely low with current
technology.
Even if the difficulties
with the technology were
overcome, individuals
produced from this
alcohol-preserved specimen
would all have exactly the
same genetic make-up and
would be the same sex —
unless new genes could be
artificially introduced into
DNA from a thylacine in a
museum.
All science is carried
out in a social and economic
context. A group of
individuals like this could
not make up a viable
population. The idea of a
lone and lonely mammoth or
thylacine in a zoo or
wildlife park is of concern
to wildlife managers and to
the community.
In 2008, scientists from
the University of Melbourne
extracted DNA from a
100-year-old thylacine pouch
young specimen at the
Victoria Museum. They
managed to incorporate a
small piece of DNA involved
in the regulation of bone
development genes into the
genome of a mouse. The
thylacine DNA functioned
normally in the mouse cells.
It was the first time that
DNA from an extinct species
has ever been used to induce
a biological function in
another living organism.
This type of work shows
that even if a species is
extinct, its genetic
information is not lost. The
function of genes from
extinct animals can still be
determined, revealing
information about the
evolutionary relationships
of the animals and about how
the particular genes evolved
their particular functions. |