biogenist_top_1




A Scientific Approach To Biotechnology

biogenist_Banner_under_links
A Scientific approch to biotechnology between_pic_1 Biotechnology between_pic_2 Biotechnology Help
biogenist_divider_hor
 

Understanding Biotechnology


What is Biotechnology

Overview of Biotechnology

  Then and Now of Biotechnology
 

History of Biotechnology

  Gene Technology
  What is a gene
  Gene Technology Techniques
  Genetic modification myths
  Genes code for proteins
  What is DNA
  Where is DNA
  The Full Set
  What does DNA look like
  What does DNA work
  DNA Unknown

Why do we do biotechnology?


  Why do we do biotechnology?
  Biotechnology for ourselves

Biotechnology for the environment

Biotechnology for food and agriculture

How do you do biotechnology?

  How do you do biotechnology
Finding the gene you want
  Cutting and pasting genes
  Moving genes
  Reading and interpreting genes
  Cloning a gene
  Cloning plants
  Cloning animals
Biotechnology Applications

  Human Uses
  Fighting infectious diseases
  Antibiotics
  Producing human products
  Reproductive technologies
  The human genome project
  Genetic disorders
  Gene therapy
  Cloning
  Stem cells
  Transplantation
  DNA profiling
  Environment
  Biological control of pests
  Protecting threatened species
  Resurrecting extinct species
  Cleaning up and managing
  Researching new products
  Food and Agriculture
  Feed Me
  A problem with weeds
  A problem with insects
  Other reasons to modify crops
  The international scene
  Genetically modified food labeling
  Health and Medical
  Biotechnology in medicines
  Clinical trials
  Gene therapy
  Genes and cancer
  What are ethics
Benefits & Risks of Biotechnology

  Arguments for and against gene
  A nutritionist's view on GM foods
  Balance sheet 2020
  Sustaining the Food supply
Biotechnology Resources

  Ethics of biotechnology
  Conferences and events
  Forums and Communities
  Biotechnology Websites
  Glossary of terms
   
 
 

 

  Bookmark and Share

 

Resurrecting extinct species

  The movie Jurassic Park provided the fantasy, and Dolly the sheep gave us the reality, when after more than 200 attempts, a new individual was cloned using the nucleus of an udder cell. Since Dolly, mice, cattle and many other animals have also been successfully cloned.

But, what about those species which have already become extinct? Specimens of these animals (and their DNA) can sometimes be found in alcohol-filled preserving bottles in museum storerooms. Is cloning likely to help resurrect these species?

Cloning is a very inefficient process. Even in the Hawaiian laboratory of Professor Ryuzo Yanagimachi, where the best results have been achieved so far, only 3% of cloned mice embryos survive to birth.

This laboratory has the best possible conditions for mouse cloning and all the relevant knowledge available on the timing of reproduction. In addition, many females can be treated to receive the embryos at the appropriate time in their reproductive cycle.

The laboratory of Professor Yanagimachi now has a population of about 80 cloned mice. These have been cloned using nuclei from tissues including nerves, tail tips and the diffuse cloud of cells which surrounds recently ovulated eggs.

Extracting DNA from an insect trapped in amber, as in Jurassic Park, is a very long way from making a real dinosaur. Despite successful efforts extracting bacteria from insects preserved in amber, it is still only speculation that we could ever extract DNA from the blood sucked by mosquitoes from dinosaurs millions of years ago. Big leaps of technology and skill are still required before creating a dinosaur could be contemplated.

 
 

The thylacine: a case study

  Despite successes in cloning mice and a small number of other currently living species, the possibility of successfully cloning an individual from the frozen remains of a woolly mammoth recently discovered in the Siberian permafrost or a 100-year-old alcohol-preserved thylacine (Tasmanian tiger) seems remote.

For both these specimens, the first stage of the process — extracting DNA samples from the preserved tissue — has been achieved. From there the going gets tougher, even though the starting materials are far better than those available for the dinosaur cloning seen in the movie Jurassic Park.

In 1999, DNA was successfully extracted from an ethanol‑preserved Tasmanian tiger pup sample. In 2001, additional DNA was extracted from two other pups using tissue from bone, tooth, bone marrow and dried muscle.

In 2002, the Evolutionary Biology Unit at the Australian Museum in Sydney successfully replicated individual Tasmanian tiger genes using a process known as PCR. The next stage would have been to make copies of all the genes of the Tasmanian tiger to construct synthetic chromosomes. However, in 2005, the project was abandoned, because the DNA was found to be too degraded to work with effectively.

Producing viable embryos would be too difficult — perhaps even impossible — using the DNA preserved through freezing or in alcohol, as it is often damaged. Given the low efficiency of mouse cloning experiments, in which intact nuclei from living cells were used as the source of DNA for cloning, the likelihood of being able to clone an animal from a preserved specimen is extremely low with current technology.

Even if the difficulties with the technology were overcome, individuals produced from this alcohol-preserved specimen would all have exactly the same genetic make-up and would be the same sex — unless new genes could be artificially introduced into DNA from a thylacine in a museum.

All science is carried out in a social and economic context. A group of individuals like this could not make up a viable population. The idea of a lone and lonely mammoth or thylacine in a zoo or wildlife park is of concern to wildlife managers and to the community.

In 2008, scientists from the University of Melbourne extracted DNA from a 100-year-old thylacine pouch young specimen at the Victoria Museum. They managed to incorporate a small piece of DNA involved in the regulation of bone development genes into the genome of a mouse. The thylacine DNA functioned normally in the mouse cells. It was the first time that DNA from an extinct species has ever been used to induce a biological function in another living organism.

This type of work shows that even if a species is extinct, its genetic information is not lost. The function of genes from extinct animals can still be determined, revealing information about the evolutionary relationships of the animals and about how the particular genes evolved their particular functions.

   
 
   
biogenist_Bottom